Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Sunday, April 15, 2018

The West Sides with Terrorists Against Syria

Swayed by the crudest and most suspect propaganda:

The West Sides with Terrorists Against Syria

“Pro-monster in all parts of the world”

By Peter Hitchens | Mail on Sunday

London, April 15, 2018 – Why do so many people in politics and the media want to start wars? Since I toured a sordid hospital full of wounded people in Bucharest at Christmas 1989, and even more after I saw for the first time (in Vilnius in 1991) what a human head looks like after a bullet has passed through it, I have seen it as an absolute duty to warn against armed conflict. It is a filthy thing.

No doubt there are times when we must fight. But there are plenty more when we should not. Any fool can kill a man in a second and ruin a city in a week. But it takes long years of nurture to raise a child to adulthood, and centuries to build a civilization.

Yet I look around me and see the mouths of intelligent people opened wide, yelling for an attack on Syria, when the only certain outcome of that will be blood and screams and ruins, and the deaths of innocents in 'collateral damage.' What good will this do? 

What is wrong with them? They are not cruel and stupid, yet they call for actions which are both.

Haven't we got enough misery in Syria already? The place is a mass of ruins, graveyards and refugee camps. To what end? The only mercy for Syria will come when the war ends, yet we seek to widen and extend it.

Don't we have more than enough of such disaster in Iraq and Libya, where state-sponsored panic and emotional claims of atrocities excused the launching of wars so stupid and dangerous that I wonder if these places can ever recover? 

Perhaps worse, by creating an unending river of migrants through the Middle East and the Mediterranean, I suspect they have ruined Europe for good.

Why are we even taking sides in Syria? As Julian Lewis MP, chairman of Parliament’s Defense Select Committee, rightly pointed out last week, President Assad is a monster. But his opponents are maniacs. 

The Syrian jihadi gangsters which the British Government crazily helps and backs – the Al-Nusra Front and Jaish al-Islam – are the sort of fanatics we would arrest on sight if we found them in Birmingham.

Anyway, Boris Johnson's Foreign Office is firmly pro-monster in all parts of the world where it suits it to be so. 

British Royals and Ministers literally bow down as they accept medals from the head-chopping fanatics of Saudi Arabia, now engaged in a bloody, aggressive war in Yemen.

Britain maintains a naval base in Bahrain, whose rulers in 2011 crushed protests with severe violence followed by torture. 

As Amnesty International puts it, 'using an array of tools of repression, including harassment, arbitrary detention and torture, the government of Bahrain has managed to crush a formerly thriving civil society and reduced it to a few lone voices who still dare to speak out'.

Britain daren't even admit that our 'friend' Egypt is ruled by a military junta that seized power illegally in defiance of elections which we had supposedly supported but which produced the wrong result.

Field Marshal Sisi's August 2013 Cairo massacre, in which almost 600 peaceful protesters were killed and thousands more wounded, is politely forgotten. 

So is the Chinese communist regime's mass murder (1,000 are estimated to have died) in Peking in June 1989. 

The men whose power rests on that ruthless massacre are welcome to dine at Buckingham Palace. But surely we can't allow Assad to use chemical weapons? 

We would never tolerate that. Would we? Well, when Saddam Hussein was our ally against Iran back in 1988, he undoubtedly used poison gas against Kurds in Halabja. 

And in September 1988 the Foreign Office declined to get outraged, saying: 'We believe it better to maintain a dialogue with others if we want to influence their actions. 

Punitive measures such as unilateral sanctions would not be effective in changing Iraq's behavior over chemical weapons, and would damage British interests to no avail.'

Which brings me to the final point. Do we even know that Assad used chemical weapons? 

I have actually read the reports of the last such alleged attack in Khan Sheikhoun a year ago, and they prove nothing. In fact, they are quite fishy.

At the time of writing, I have yet to see a British or US media report on this alleged attack from closer than Beirut, 70 miles from the scene. 

Many seemingly confident and graphic accounts come from Istanbul, 900 miles away, or from London or Washington. 

Where are they getting their information from? Here's a clue. The Saudi-backed faction in control of Douma at the time of the alleged attack, Jaish al-Islam (the Army of Islam), were themselves accused of using poison gas against Kurds in Aleppo in April 2016.

They are not especially nice. Their other main claim to fame is that they displayed captured Syrian Army officers in cages and used them as human shields. 

They have spent several years indiscriminately shelling Damascus from Douma, having taken the local inhabitants hostage, and then squawking about war crimes if the Syrian government hit back at them, which it did much as the Iraqi government (our friends) did to Islamic State in Mosul and Fallujah.

I would not look for any heroes in this cauldron. And if you want to watch war games on a TV screen, can I suggest that you buy your own virtual reality equipment? 

The real thing may look pretty and neat, but real people die as it happens and, if you supported it, their deaths will be on your conscience.
Read more at: 


Monday, March 12, 2018

Farrakhan's Defense of Jesus against Talmudic hatred

On March 11 the Nation of Islam contacted Michael Hoffman to ask if he would corroborate Louis Farrakhan’s recent remarks about the contents of the Babylonian Talmud and its hate speech against Jesus. 


The media often attempt to put Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan on the defensive for “his notorious anti-Semitism.” Since the term anti-Goyimism is not in use to describe Orthodox Judaism’s institutionalized hatred of non-Jews in their most sacred text—the Babylonian Talmud—the staged morality play almost always consists of offended Judaics pointing righteous fingers of accusation at “moral lepers” like Louis Farrakhan. It’s a kind of media-enabled psychological warfare. 

When Farrakhan defends Jesus Christ against hateful insults in the Babylonian Talmud, the ADL, Southern Poverty Law Center and mainstream media term him a “hater," while the Talmudists are cast as the perpetual victims. 

Hate speech against Jesus and bigotry toward his true followers is of little concern to the media. Their universe spins on their mission of suppressing exposure of the sacred hate in the Talmud. In their Wonderland world, anyone like Farrakhan who undertakes that exposure, is a “hater”—educating the public about hate speech in Judaism becomes an act of hate. This is a form of quintessentially Talmudic logic known as “pilpul.”

At present Mr. Farrakhan is at the center of another firestorm of controversy as a few leading members of the Leftist “Women’s March” are refusing to join the witch hunt against him: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/09/us/louis-farrakhan-facts-history.html

Watching Mr. Farrakhan’s brief remarks about the Talmud and Jesus, as part of his “Saviour’s Day” oration last February, I was stung by his final sentence. 

In his speech, Farrakhan accurately cited the exact passage in the Babylonian Talmud that teaches that for his alleged sins, Jesus is in hell being boiled in feces.  

Addressing the Christians of the West he stated, “You wouldn’t even have the courage — the testicular fortitude — to ask them (the rabbis) why did they want to boil the man you call your Savior, in excrement.”

Here is a Muslim despised by Republican Conservatives, doing for the glory of the Holy Name of Jesus what nationally known Christian leaders should be doing. Instead, they cower.

There is almost no public figure with the world renown and audience numbers of Louis Farrakhan who would dare to say what he said. 

Yes, Chuck Baldwin, Texe Marrs, Bishop Richard Williamson, Herman Otten and Dave Barley would do so, and may have have already done so, but they have not the fame or international influence of the Nation of Islam (NOI) leader—and few of us possess Farrakhan’s dramatic oratorical command of the spoken word.

After his remarks on the bigotry of the Talmud resulted in cries of “Bigotry!” from the usual suspects, including aspersions on the accuracy of his Talmud citation, this writer was contacted by the Research Department of the NOI, which is responsible for authoring the magisterial three volume revisionist history of Judaic involvement in black enslavement, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews

The Nation of Islam asked if I would corroborate Mr. Farrakhan’s remarks about the contents of the Talmud, and its statements about Jesus. The result is the article below, which is reprinted on the website of the Nation of Islam, where you can also find a nearly two minute video excerpt of Farrakhan’s stirring defense of Jesus. 

This writer is certainly no Muslim, but I am a Bible reader and believer. I have noted how often the Scriptures speak again and again of the vital importance of the holy name of God, whether in reference to Yahweh or His Divine Son:  

Your sins are forgiven you for His name’s sake.” (John 1: 2:12). 

“I will sing praise to the name of the Lord Most High” (Psalm 7:17). 

“How excellent is your name in all the earth” (Psalm 8:1). 

“Those who know your name will put their trust in you” (Psalm 9:10). 

“In the name of God we will set up our banners” (Psalm 20:5).  

Meanwhile, the Talmud has placed the banner of Jesus in hell and the ministers of Churchianity are o.k. with it. 

Farrakhan is confronting today’s so-called Christians with the appalling fact that they hold in good repute a religion that splatters the Holy Name of Jesus with excrement. Other than some Church of Satan cult, I can’t think of any other creed on earth that would stoop so low or be more deserving of exposure, even as we offer Christ’s love to the Judaic people who are in bondage to its iniquity.

For all the derision of Muslims in Right wing churches and culture, I daresay that Mr. Farrakhan, notwithstanding his Islamic faith, shall perhaps reach Paradise long before many of his “Christian” detractors, who cannot summon the “testicular fortitude” to unmask the religion that teaches to generations of Judaic youth, such filthy and depraved fantasies about our Savior.

Are you listening, Mike Pence?

“The Nation of Islam Research Group asked Talmudic expert Michael Hoffman to view the clip and give his opinion on the veracity of The Minister’s statement about the Talmud. His response is below"

Farrakhan’s Truth about the Talmud

By Michael Hoffman
©2018 RevisionistHistory.org

The Babylonian Talmud tractate Gittin, which Minister Louis Farrakhan quoted truthfully and accurately in his Savior’s Day speech last February, is concerned in part with the fulfillment of Jesus Christ’s prophecy concerning the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem by the Romans, due to the transgressions of the Jews: 
“Jesus came out from the temple and was going away when His disciples came up to point out the temple buildings to Him. And He said to them, “Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to you, not one stone here will be left upon another, which will not be torn down...Therefore when you see the Abomination Of Desolation which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains” (Matthew 24: 1-2; 15-16).

The “Abomination Of Desolation” was the Roman Army. Jesus was warning that in less than forty years it would advance to besiege Jerusalem, and that His followers were to flee to safety, which is what they did, leaving the unbelieving Jews to suffer the consequences. 

Because the creed of Orthodox rabbinic Judaism is one of unrelenting revenge, the Roman General Titus, who personally directed the destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D., is forever an object of hatred, second only to Jesus himself. The rabbis of Orthodox Judaism have never forgiven Titus for commanding the legions who fulfilled Christ’s prophecy and destroyed the Temple at Jerusalem, along with the Jews who maintained that corrupt and doomed system. The revenge of the rabbis upon Titus is to tell nonsensical lies about him in the Talmud. 

Few Christians or Muslims are aware that in the Babylonian Talmud Jesus shares his place in hell with the Roman Titus, who is depicted as being chastised for the destruction of the Temple by being burned to ashes in hell, reassembled, burned, reassembled and burned again—for eternity (Gittin 56b). In another depraved lie, Jesus is portrayed as being punished for “leading Israel astray” by forever remaining seated in a cauldron of boiling excrement in hell (Gittin 57a). According to the law (halahca) of Talmudic Judaism, “Anyone who mocks the words of the sages will be sentenced to boiling excrement (צוֹאָה רוֹתֵחַת).”

The typical rabbinic and Zionist response to the truthful description by Minister Farrakhan and others of what the Talmud teaches about Jesus, is to lie and say that in this passage the Talmud is referring to “another Jesus,” rather than Jesus of Nazareth: “Many commentaries suggest that some or all talmudic references to Jesus refer to another person” (Koren Talmud Bavli [Jerusalem: 2015], vol. 21, footnote to p. 319).

According to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), “To agitate Christian readers, anti-Talmud writers often attempt to portray the Talmud as demeaning the figure of Jesus.” 

By the ADL’s reasoning, “anti-Talmud writers” are never scholars who are dispassionately committed to the discovery of the truth about what the Talmud teaches, but rather, they are only agitators who, from impure motives, seek to “portray” the Talmud as “demeaning” Jesus. 

How the ADL arrived at this conspiracy theory is not revealed, but the undercurrent of intimidation is clear: those who speak or write candidly and accurately concerning how Jesus is defamed in the Talmud are seeking to “agitate Christians.” No reputable person would want a career-killing stigma like that attached to his statements and most Christians and Muslims are thereby intimidated from pursuing the truth about the Talmudic depiction of Jesus. Moreover, according to the ADL, “the Talmud only refers to Jesus in a handful of places, and though these references may not reflect the courteous ecumenicism of the modern world, neither are they particularly inflammatory.” (Anti-Defamation League, The Talmud in Anti-Semitic Polemics [New York: 2003], p. 11).

The ADL expects us to believe that depicting the Christian Savior being boiled in feces is not inflammatory, while any critical observation that Mr. Farrakhan dares to utter concerning Judaism is nothing but inflammatory. The hypocrisy is all too familiar.

Long-standing denials by Talmudists and Zionists and their gentile apologists concerning the supposed absence of Jesus in the Talmud, are slowly being discredited after having held sway for centuries. David Klinghoffer elucidated this development in his essay, “What the Talmud Really Says About Jesus”:

 “...the scandalous passages indeed refer not to some other figure of ancient times but to the famous Jesus of Nazareth. What exactly is so scandalous? How about Jesus punished in Hell for eternity by being made to sit in a cauldron of boiling excrement? That image appears in early manuscripts of the Babylonian Talmud, as does a brief account of Jesus’ trial and execution—not by the Romans but by the Jewish high court, the Sanhedrin.” (Publishers Weekly, January 31, 2007).

Mr. Klinghoffer says that the “Jewish community” has been content to let the evil sayings of the Talmud about Jesus “remain obscure and unknown.” His claim is erroneous. The rabbinic “community” actively teaches these viciously bigoted statements about Jesus within their religion, while denying to the world that they are present in their sacred texts. These inconvenient facts must not be suppressed. The admission by Klinghoffer and other Judaic intellectuals that Jesus Christ is indeed targeted in the Babylonian Talmud, has brought with it no substantive analysis of the long record of rabbinic denials and falsification that preceded his revelation, and which continue in some instances, up to the present time. Mr. Klinghoffer is eager to have us pass over Judaism’s system of dissimulation as quickly as possible. 

Christians and Muslims are rightly offended at the disgraceful libels, pornographic scurrilities and hate speech in the Talmud. Louis Farrakhan, virtually alone among public figures in America, has had the courage to defend Jesus against these obscenities. 

Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York Bureau of the Associated Press and the author of nine books, including Judaism Discovered, and Judaism’s Strange Gods.


March 14, 2018

From the Nation of Islam

Dear Mr. Hoffman,

We are pleased to report that the article you prepared is the most viewed on our website over the last 3 days. 

We have just posted this article that refers to your work: 

"WHY DO JEWS HATE JESUS AND MARY? Muslims and Christians Revere Jesus and Mary; Jews hate them both.”

Thank you very much.

Hoffman’s comment:

Strange Priorities 

While Mr. Farrakhan, who honors Jesus and Mary, is vilified by politicians and the media for allegedly saying “filthy” things about Zionists, the Talmudists and their sacred books may say any filthy thing they like about Jesus and the Blessed Virgin Mary without provoking controversy in the media, or among politicians and “Christian” leaders.


Keep Michael Hoffman working in defense of the Truth:
  donate, or purchase one of our publications or recordings

Tuesday, March 06, 2018

The Real Neo-Nazis


What could be more "Nazi" than exterminating the disabled? 

Copenhagen Post, July 22, page 6

By Michael Hoffman

In America these days there is an Orwellian campaign underway to pressure social media to censor and ban the political rivals of Left wing and Israeli organizations such as the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL). Those who compete with these groups for the hearts and minds of Americans are often demonized as “neo-Nazis.” 

Washington Post, March 5

But what could be more "Nazi" than exterminating the disabled? According to the Washington Post (March 5 online) and Britain's BBC News ("A World Without Down Syndrome," September 29, 2016), 90% of Down Syndrome babies are aborted in Britain. 

The Copenhagen Post of July 22 reported that nearly 100% of such babies are killed before birth in Denmark. The BBC reports that the same is true for Iceland. 

In the U.S. this Nazi trend is gaining traction with the increasing availability of a simple, relatively new blood test that screens for Trisomy 21—the chromosome that leads to the condition, revealing to a pregnant mother that her unborn infant has the Syndrome. 

BBC News, September 29, 2016

Human beings like Frank Stephens are being exterminated through abortion in the name of human rights for women and the slogan “It’s my body.” Actually madam, it’s your body and the body of another human being inside of you who should have rights but has none. The failure to recognize the Nazi mentality behind the alibis for the mass murder of unborn Down syndrome children is a monument to human imbecility.

By their apathy and complacency, the liberal-Left is complicit in the extermination of Down Syndrome humans. The eerie similarity to Nazism troubles them not all. 

When it comes to the murder of unborn human beings it is not difficult to see that the supposed anti-Nazi stance of the liberals is a politically-motivated farce.

There is a very real, politically correct neo-Nazi movement in the world today. It is perpetrating the mass murder of Down syndrome children via abortion.

Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and the author of nine books

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

Secrets of Judaism Revealed on Purim

Secrets of Judaism Revealed on Purim

By Michael Hoffman
A Voice Crying in the Wilderness

Purim revelers in 1593

This Wednesday, February 28 at sunset, begins Purim (pronounced poor-im), the Talmudic festival of revenge on the goyim that is a twisted version of the Biblical book of Esther.

The rabbinic Purim is predicated on a reading of the “Scroll of Esther,” i.e. “Megillah Esther.”

Esther is a problematic book even without rabbinic counterfeiting. It seems to have been written in a void. God is missing from its pages and Jesus never quoted Esther. The name Esther is derived from the Hebrew Nistar which denotes “hidden.” We consign the Book of Esther to the category of a mystery. 

The rabbis chose to add to it significantly, as is their custom with regard to the books of the Hebrew Bible. 

According to their Midrash on Esther, she was married to Mordechai: “Not only was Esther an upright Jewish woman who abhorred the notion of marriage to the goy king Ahasuerus, she was actually already married to Mordechai, who was the greatest sage (master of the oral law) of his generation. Every time Esther went to Ahasuerus, she was literally taken and forced to be with him. Throughout her ‘marriage’ to Ahasuerus, Esther still remained loyal to her true husband, Mordechai. After leaving Ahasuerus’ presence she would immerse in a mikvah (ritual bath) and then secretly rendezvous with Mordechai”

The preceding convoluted fabrication is typical of the Talmudic perversion of the Biblical narrative. 

The megillah states that Mordechai took Esther as a “bat,” a daughter. The rabbis claim that “bat” actually means “bayit,” or home, a euphemism for wife. (Similar absurd wordplay in the Babylonian Talmud [Sota 42b] is used to “prove” that the mother of David’s opponent, the giant Goliath, was addicted to anal sex). 

On Purim it is necessary for the Judaic male to get drunk; he is to become so completely drunk that he can’t discern good from evil —  “No longer distinguish between arur Haman (‘Cursed is Haman’) and baruch Mordechai (‘Blessed is Mordecai’); (Megillah 7b). 

Here is film footage of Orthodox Talmud-followers drunk in the streets of Jerusalem during Purim:

More Purim drunks:

Revealing these facts to you puts this writer in jeopardy, in the dangerous category of apikorus (heretic). You are not supposed to be reading these words and I am not to write them.

One of the foods served on the holiday of Purim are “Haman’s ears” (oznei Haman), baked in the form of a pastry. In the Kabbalistic understanding of this minhag (custom), as personified by the Hasidic “sage” Rabbi Zvi Elimelech of Dinov, the hearing of knowledge (da’at) not authorized by the rabbis and which emanates from an apikorus, is a spiritual danger: “Consuming the ears of Haman at the Purim meal symbolizes eliminating wicked opinions —  the evil da'at, which is represented by the hearing ears. This is the particular spiritual threat posed by Amalek, who was the progenitor of Haman.”

It is also the “threat” posed by the apikorus Jesus Christ who said, “He who has ears to hear, let him hear” (Matthew 11:15). 

In the Zionist-influenced media it is the Catholic priest and the pulpit-pounding Calvinist who are made to represent heresy-hunting, and the  tolerant and loving rabbis and their communities who are depicted as the targets of the inquisitors, never the other way around; this is a reversal of the actual reality that Jesus spoke of in Matthew 23:30-39.

The religion of the Talmud and the Kabbalah is an anti-Biblical occult system. On Purim the adherents of these texts dress Halloween-style in all manner of grotesque attire. In 2013 New York state legislator Dov Hikind mocked black people by dressing in minstrel blackface and an Afro wig (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpYJ3funHHw). 

In this film footage dozens of rabbis and hundreds of their followers are gathered for a reading of the Megillah of Esther and what you will observe has nothing to do with the sanctity or the learned gravitas that Steven Spielberg and the controlled media have branded onto our minds in association with Talmudists. What you will see is something akin to unholy pandemonium: 

Every October Protestant fundamentalists vigorously protest and warn against the observance of Halloween, but these faint-hearted folk have few words of protest or warning about Purim. Apparently Judaic souls are not worth the effort.

Megillah (מגילה \ מְגִלָּה) is etymologically related to the word galah (גָּלָה): “to reveal.” (Strong’s Hebrew (1540) defines it as: “to uncover”). It can be translated as “Revelation of the Hidden.”

The creed of the Talmudists is at bottom a farce; an impersonation of the religion of the Bible. Nowhere on earth will this be revealed in greater detail and with more impact than in the rites and ceremonies that will take place beginning at sundown on Purim, and in particular in the ritual of Purimspiel

Here is one manifestation of the Purimspiel farce:

When the truth about an iniquitous enterprise is conveyed to you, you are doubly under obligation, and doubly convicted if you do nothing with the knowledge.

©2018 by RevisionistHistory.org

Michael Hoffman, a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press, is the author of Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit (1,102 pages, Independent History and Research, 2008).

For further study
Chronicle of Calamities and Catastrophes